Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23326 (RAJ)

RAMJILAL S/O SHRI YAADRAM v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR

CW/10149/2025 · 2025-07-11

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25655] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10149/2025 Ramjilal S/o Shri Yaadram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Gehankar, Panchayat Samiti Tijara, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. District Collector, Of District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 2. Chief Executive Officer Jila Parishad, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S Ola For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/07/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a complaint was made by the petitioner along with several villagers to the District Collector-Khairthal Tijara alleging therein that the brother- in- law of the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Tijara is misusing her position. Counsel submits that the aforesaid complaint has been referred by the Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar, to the Block Development Officer, Khairthal Tijara for making an inquiry. Counsel submits that the aforesaid order was issued by the Additional Chief Executive Officer on 13.11.2024 and 18.03.2025. Counsel submits that thereafter a Committee has been constituted to inquire the allegations made in the complaint but thereafter nothing has been done, hence interference of this Court is warranted. [2025:RJ-JP:25655] (2 of 2) [CW-10149/2025] 2. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the complaint has been referred by the Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar to Block Development Officer who has constituted a Committee of three members to inquire about the allegation levelled in the complaint. It is expected from the Committee concerned and from the respondents to do the needful inquiry after affording due opportunity of hearing to the Sarpanch and all the aggrieved. 3. Needless to observe that the Committee would conclude the inquiry within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. The present writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the respondents to proceed further with the matter in a particular way, the respondents would be at liberty to proceed with the matter strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/23