Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23326 (GAU)

SHRI TEMJENYANGER JAMIR v. MS JOYEE SEN AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/143/2025 · 2025-10-21

Anjan Moni Kalita, Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020004702025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/143/2025 SHRI TEMJENYANGER JAMIR GENERAL MANAGER, NAGALAND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, IDC HOUSE, DIMAPUR, NAGALAND-797112 VERSUS MS JOYEE SEN AND 2 ORS GENERAL MANAGER, NAGALAND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, IDC HOUSE, DIMAPUR, NAGALAND-7971122:THE STATE OF NAGALAND REPRESENTED BY THE COMMSSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE GOVT. OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA-797001 3:THE NAGALAND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. GOVT. OF NAGALAND UNDERTAKING REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR IDC HOUSE DIMAPUR NAGALAND-79711 Advocate for the Petitioner : TAKA MASA, SR. ADV, Advocate for the Respondent : , :::BEFORE::: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA 22.10.2025 (P.J. Saikia, J) Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. L. Iralu, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 5 (five) days in preferring the connected writ appeal. Mr. Zhimomi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection, if the prayer for condonation is allowed. We have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and we find that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly, the delay of 5 (five) days in preferring the connected writ appeal is hereby condoned. With the above observation, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant