[2025:RJ-JP:28119] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11113/2019 Mani Ram Chahar S/o Shri Arjun Ram, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Village And Post Malarkhera, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Commissioner/ Secretary, Higher/ College Education, Siksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 3. The Secretary, Managing Committee Of Swami Keshwanand Mahavidyalya, Gramothan Vidhyapeeth, College Of Agriculture Art, Science And Commerce, Sangaria, District Hanumangarh. 4. The Principal, Swami Keshwanand Mahavidyalya, Gramothan Vidhyapeeth, College Of Agriculture Art, Science And Commerce, Sangaria, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Singh, Dy.G.C Mr. Ashish Vijay for Ms. Sumati Bishnoi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/07/2025 1. Petitioner claims himself to be appointed on the post of UDC by the Management Committee of Swami Keshwanand Mahavidyalaya and was posted at G.V. College of Agriculture, Art, Science and Commerce, Sangaria District Hanumangarh. 2. Admittedly, petitioner has retired from such post w.e.f. 31.08.2001, yet has come up with a case of absorption by the [2025:RJ-JP:28119] (2 of 2) [CW-11113/2019] State Government under the Rajasthan Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 (for short "Rules of 2010") and claiming grant of benefit of selection scale on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service as also pay fixation, gratuity, arrears of salary etc. under such Rules. 3. Learned Deputy Government Counsel appearing on behalf of Higher Education submits that petitioner's name was never received to the State Government by Management Committee and on record of respondents, petitioner's name does not find place. 4. Taking admitted case of petitioner, as pleaded in the writ petition, since petitioner has stood retired w.e.f. 31.08.2001, his claim of grant of selection and other benefits under the Rules of 2010 is not governed under the Rules of 2010 and accordingly, petitioner is not entitled for any relief as prayed for in the instant writ petition. 5. As a result, the writ petition is bereft of merits and same is hereby dismissed. 6. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN/TANISHA /26