Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23322 (CHH)

RAHUL SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1747/2025 · 2025-06-11

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:23269-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1747 of 2025 1 Rahul Sahu S/o Son Singh Aged About 27 Years R/o Village - Baghul, Police Station - Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 2 Smt. Geeta Sahu W/o Son Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Village - Baghul, Police Station - Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 3 Smt. Swati Sahu W/o Rajesh Sahu Aged About 26 Years R/o Village - Ranbod, Police Station - Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 4 Shri Son Singh S/o Late Bhagwani Sahu Aged About 54 Years R/o Village - Baghul, Police Stataion - Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Mahila Thana, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 2 Smt. Savita Sahu W/o Rahul Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Village - Tilaibhath, Police Station - Kunda, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, P.L. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.06.13 10:55:03 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 12/06/2025 1. Heard Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsels for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 615/2025 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) including the Charge Sheet No. 02/2025 dated 30.01.2025 and FIR bearing Crime No. 03/2025 registered at Mahila Thana, Kawardha, Kabirdham (C.G.), in the interest of justice. District” 3. From perusal of the relief prayed for in the present petition, it transpires that the same is a defective one as the counsel for the petitioners has not mentioned the particulars with respect to the order taking cognizance and he has only drafted a vague and sketchy prayer. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, 3 subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Learned State counsel is present. 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti/ $ Bhilwar