IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ Pi X ■K ^ \ 7j PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 428 OF 2009 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt. 04-07-2008 in WP No. 13180 of 2005 on the file of the High Court. Between: The Nallam Vari Satram, Charitable Institution, Rajahmundry, E.G.District rep. by its Founder Trustee. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT N0.1 AND 1. Smt. Bometi Nagaratnam, W/o. Late Dommeti Nagabhushnam, Aged 70 years, R/o. Anatavaram, Mummidivaram Mandal, E.G.district. Kamuju Subbisetty, S/o. Late K. Harischandrudu, aged 55 years, R/o. Anavavaram, Mummidivaram Mandal, E.G.District. Sattala Satyanarayana, S/o. Sattala Suraiah, aged 30 years, R/o. Mimmithi subrahmanyam. S/p. Chinna Reddy, aged 70 years, R/o. Anavavaram, Mummidivaram Mandal, E.G.District. 2. 3. 4. ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS 5. The Commissioner of Endowntents, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT -2 p l-A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WAMP. NO: 892 OF 2009^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order in WP No. 13180 of 2005 dt. 04-07-2008, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI V T M PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI CCS SASTRY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT 9 [3483] APHC010328882009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 428 of 2009 ...Appellant(s) The Nallam Vari Satram, E.G. Dist. and Others Vs. Smt Bometi Nagaratnam E.G. Dist and Others ...Respondent(s) •kieie-kic'k-k-k'k'k Advocate for Appellant; Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mrs. S. Pranathi, Special Government Pleader CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 25th March 2025 PC : The present writ appeal is preferred against the judgment and order, dated 04.07.2008, passed in W.P. No.13180 of 2005. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners without following the procedure contemplated in 2. the rules. 3. We are of the opinion that there is no perversity in the judgment and order impugned, as law does not envisage the eviction of a person except by following the procedure prescribed by law. However, since none has caused 2 HCJ a RC,J W.A. No: 428 of 2009 appearance today, we presume that the appellant has lost interest in the matter. 4. The writ appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR j //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER S To, 1. One CC to Sri V T M Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri C C S Sastry, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:25/03/2025 JUDGMENT x” 0 2 APR 2C?5 I ^ Current Section . JJl WA.No.428 of 2009 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS