2025:HHC:31486 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA LPA No. 628 of 2025 Decided on: 12.09.2025 __________________________________________________________ Madan Kant ...Appellant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the appellant: Mr. George, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice[Oral] After the consent order which was passed by the learned Single Judge on 29.05.2025, the petition was disposed of by noting that the appellant has been adjusted at GSSS Jahu, District Hamirpur, keeping in view the fact that the son of appellant is 100% disabled and is suffering from hearing impairment by birth. Order dated 29.05.2025 reads as under:- “Pursuant to the order dated 26.05.2025, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order dated 28.05.2025, in terms of which petitioner has been adjusted at GSSS Jahu, District 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:31486 - 2 - Hamirpur, considering that petitioner’s son is 100% disabled and is suffering from hearing impairment by birth. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of aforesaid office order, grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 3. Taking note of above, present petition to stand disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.” 2. Counsel for the State has also placed on record joining report dated 30.05.2025 by the present appellant. Moreover, we have also perused the original zimini orders passed by the learned Single Judge whereby, apparently against transfer order dated 03.05.2025/06.05.2025 and subsequently reliving order dated 09.05.2025, against which the appellant had approached this Court. 3. It has been brought to the notice of learned Single Judge that the appellant has completed 15 years of service at the school from where he was being transferred namely GSSS Khanot [Mandi]. 4. Resultantly, counsel had given three options from where he could be adjusted in District Mandi, District Bilaspur and District Hamirpur. It is in such circumstances, the consent order was passed on 2025:HHC:31486 - 3 - 29.05.2025 and the petitioner has been adjusted at Jahu. 5. In such circumstances, having joined there we feel that it is only after thought, as such, to file the present appeal. We may have sympathy, as such, with family regarding disability of the son, but keeping in view the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted before learned Single Judge and it was on the basis of concession which was accepted by the appellant, we are not inclined to entertain the present appeal. 6. Accordingly, present appeal is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 12th September, 2025 [himani/Bhardwaj]