Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23314 (AP)

Smt. Kadupu Sushma, v. THE REGISTRAR

WP/17988/2025 · 2025-07-07

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010328142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17988 OF 2025 Between: Smt. Kadupu Sushma. D/o C. Vaikunta Rao.aged residing at Plot No MIG - 41 years, Occ: Advocate K.A.P. VUDA Layout, Cantonment, 704, Vizianagaram Vizianagaram District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Registrar, Family Court, Vizianagaram, District Court Complex, Phool Baug Colony Road, Vizianagaram, Andhra 2. The Principal District Judge, Vizianagaram. District Court Complex, Phool Baug Colony Road Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh-535002 3. The III Additional Sessions Judge Family Court District Court Complex, Phool Baug Colony Andhra Pradesh-535002 4. Sri Kadupu Balaji, aged 42 Residing at House No. 20-15-131, Stadium Peta Colony, Vizianagaram’ Vizianagaram District. Pradesh-535002 Judge, Vizianagaram, Road, Vizianagaram, years, S/o Venkata Ganapathi Rao ...Respondents f Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the the High Court may be more particularly in a nature of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, pleased to issue a writ or order or a direction writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents particularly 3rd for correction of errors in recorded Respondent to allow the application statements of cross- examination in F.C.O.P. No. 74 of 2019 on the file of the Family Judge Court at Vizianagaram and also re-open the evidence of the petitioner and respondent No.4. jA NO: 1 OF 709!^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated m the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to grant stay of all further proceedings in F.C.O.P. No. 74 of 2019 the Family Judge Court at Vizianagara on the file of m. jA NO: 2 OF 907^ Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to allow the application for correction of recorded statement in F.C.O.P. No. 74 of 2019 Vizianagaram. on the file of the Family Judge Court at Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: M/S. PADMAJA CHINTANIPPULA APHC010328142025 Bench Sr.No:-11 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17988 of 2025 Smt. Kadupu Sushma ...Petitioner Vs. The Registrar, Family Court, Vizianagaram and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner Ms.Padmaja Chintanippula Advocate for Respondents CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 8^^ July, 2025 DATE PC : Office objection is over ruled. The grievance of the petitioner is that an application filed by her seeking correction in the statement recorded in the Court during the proceedings 1 ) which were pending before the Court below required modification and correction. It is stated that the application was refused to be entertained by the Presiding Officer concerned. It appears from the record that the application was not entertained on account of certain objections raised by the Presiding Officer of the Court. 2 HCJ & RC, J WP 17988 2025 It appears that the petitioner had sent the application to the Officer directly and it was not filed in the open Court. It also appears that an advance copy had not been furnished to the party opposite. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the application was filed in the open Court which was not entertained by the Presiding Officer for the reasons best known to the said Officer. Be that as it may, we dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned by following due process and procedure. The application if filed in accordance with the procedure shall be entertained and appropriate orders shall be passed by the Presiding Officer concerned. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Registrar, Family Court, Vizianagaram, District Court Complex Phool Baug Colony Road, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh-535002 2. The Principal District Judge, Vizianagaram Phool Baug Colony Road Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh-535002 3. The III Additional Sessions Judge Family Court Judge, Vizianagaram District Court Complex, Phool Baug Colony Andhra Pradesh-535002 4. The Registrar (Judicial), High Court of AP at Amaravathi. 5. One CC to M/s. Padmaja Chintanippula Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies District Court Complex Road,Vizianagaram TF high court DATED:08/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17988 OF 2025 disposing of the w. p., WITHOUT COSTS