Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23312 (CHH)

SUBHASH GURJAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1687/2025 · 2025-06-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22856 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1687 of 2025 1 - Subhash Gurjar S/o Late Shyokaran Gurjar Aged About 36 Years R/o Village - Manchi, P.S. - Harsora, District - Alwar (Rajasthan) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station - Tikrapara, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Jitendra Shukla, Government Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 10.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 23.07.2024 passed in MCRC No. 4623 of 2024, while allowing the bail petition to the petitioner, namely, Subhash Gujar had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.06.12 11:08:36 +0530 2 3. Earlier on one occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 24.01.2025. 4. The learned Special Judge, (NDPS Act), District- Raipur (C.G.) vide her request letter dated 09.05.2025 has requested for grant of more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in this case, after the charges were framed, the accused has been absent since 07/08/2024, resulting in no witness statements being recorded. The accused is a resident of State of Rajasthan, making it difficult to serve the arrest warrant. Attempts have been made to arrest the accused at their residence but they are constantly absconded. Proceedings under Section 84 of the BNSS for proclamation and publication for his presence are pending. hence the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time therefore, he prays for grant of further more time for concluding the same. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali