- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19903 WP No. 11714 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 11714 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: PURAVANKARA LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 130/1, ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042. REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE-LEGAL, JATIN UJJINI C.S. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRABHULING NAVADGI., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ARAVIND GHIMIRAY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, KPTCL CORPORATE OFFICE, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, KPTCL CORPORATE OFFICE, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR - PROJECTS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19903 WP No. 11714 of 2025 4. THE BESCOM, BESCOM CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR - TECHNICAL. 5. THE BESCOM, C,O AND M, BENGALURU SOUTH ZONE, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.S.KALLESHAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO 5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Prabhuling Navadgi., Senior counsel on behalf of Sri.Aravind Ghimiray., for the petitioner, Sri.Rajakumar.M., AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.K.S.Kalleshappa., counsel for respondents 2 to 5 have appeared in person. 2. Sri.Prabhuling Navadgi., Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made several representations to respondents 2 to 5 and the last of the one was made on 15.03.2025 for supply of electricity connection to the residential buildings constructed by the petitioner. However, the same have not been considered as of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19903 WP No. 11714 of 2025 today. Senior counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. Counsel for the respondents submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record. 3. A mandamus is ordered directing respondents 2 to 5 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with the law within two weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. 4. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52