APHC010328692021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19736/2021 Between: SR. SANAPALA RAMANNA, S/O LATE S. RAMA SWAMY HINDU, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 39-20-15 MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530007 ADHAR NUMBER.7480 9597 2824. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME ), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, POLICE BARRACKS SURYABAGH, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, A.P. - 530001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST ZONE BEHIND R AND B, MADHAVADHARA VUDA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , LAW AND ORDER, R AND B, MADHAVADHARA VUDA COLONY, BEHIND RTA OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. SRI KURUMETI VISWANATHA GUPTA, S/O LATE K. VENKATA KAMESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED 65 YEARS, R/AT D.NO. 14-37- 24/26, KRISHNA NAGAR, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M.M.M. KRISHNA SANAPALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in interfering in the issue of the writ property calling the petitioner many times to the police station at the instance of unofficial 5th respondent regarding the writ property described in the affidavit, extent of 271 sq.yds situated in S.No. 29 part of Madhavadhara village, within the limits of GVMC, SRO Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam District is illegal, arbitrary, high handed violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents not to interfere in civil disputes pending in between Petitioner and 5th Respondent regarding writ property mentioned in annexure of the affidavit at extent of 271 sq.yds. situated in S.no. 29 part of Madhavadhara village, within the limits of GVMC, SRO Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam District.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.M.M.Krishna Sanapala, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that they intend to withdraw the petition and hence the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19736 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Dinesh