- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46767 RFA No. 2158 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2158 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: DR. MOHAMMED ALTAF HUSSAIN S/O G HUSSAIN PIRAL AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A NO.732, 12TH MAIN, III STAGE RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR C.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A 16TH CROSS, SHREE GANDHADA NAGAR, HEGGANAHALLI, VISHVANIDAM POST, BENGALURU – 560 091. 2. SADIQ S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.16, KAREEMSAB LAYOUT, SHREEGANDHADA KAVALU BENGALURU – 560 091 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHASHANK SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 03.05.2019 PASSED IN OS. Mo. 1166/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46767 RFA No. 2158 of 2019 NO.27) BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND MESNE PROFIT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT The appellant/plaintiff and the respondent No.1 are present before the Court along with their respective Advocates and submitted that they have compromised the matter with each other amicably and accordingly, a Compromise Petition is filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and prays to dispose of the appeal in terms of said Compromise Petition. 2. Said compromise petition is placed on record. Both parties present before the Court submit that they have entered this Compromise Petition out of their own free will and without any force, threat or coercion. In view of the same, the appeal is disposed of in terms of Compromise Petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46767 RFA No. 2158 of 2019 3. Draw the decree accordingly. Copy of the Compromise Petition shall be part and parcel of the decree. 4. In view of compromise entered into between parties, the Court fee shall be refunded in favour of the appellant in accordance with law. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3