1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.457 OF 2011 C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.458 OF 2011 IN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.457 OF 2011 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GANGAMMA W/O RANGAPPA D/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O CHANNAVALLI, NARAYANAKERE HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 135. 2. SMT. DEVEERAMMA W/O HABBANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O NANJUNDAIAH R/O HEBBUR JANATHA COLONY TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 135. 3. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O MARIYAPPA @ HONNAPPA D/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O KURISHNAIAHNAPALYA KOTHAGERE HOBLI 2 KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 135. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.A.K. GOWDA, ADV., (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT DODDAMMA W/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. SMT BHAGYAMMA D/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESPONDENT 1 AND 2 R/AT SULEKUPPE KAVAL GIDADAPALYA KOTHAGERE HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 3. SMT SENAMMA W/O REVANNA D/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 4. REVANNA S/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS. 3 AND 4 R/AT GOTTIKERE MAJARE CHANNATHIMMAIAHNAPALYA HUTRIDURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 3 5. SMT SENAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT SULEKUPPE KAVAL GIDADAPALYA KOTHAGERE HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 6. G RAMESH S/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT CHANNAVALI HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 7. NAGARAJA S/O NARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT CHANNAVALI TEVARU HEBBUR TALUK, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DIRICT 572 135 8. SMT BORAMMA W/O ALAMALLIGE R/AT KURISHNAIAHNAPALYA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.N.SHANKAR NARAYANA BHAT, ADV. FOR R1 TO R4 R5, R8 ARE SERVED. NOTICE TO R6 & R7 IS H/S.) * * * THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE 4 DATED: 29.10.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.471/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMKUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 17.09.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.19/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) KUNIGAL AND ETC. IN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.458 OF 2011 BETWEEN: 1. SMT SHIVAMMA D/O.MARIYAPPA @ HONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS KRISHNAIAHNAPALYA, KOTHAGERE HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DIST TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135. 2. SMT GANGAMMA W/O.RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS CHANNAVALLI VILLAGE HEBBUR HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 3. SMT DEVEERAMMA W/O HABBANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O JANATHA COLONY HEBBUR, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DITRICT 572 135 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.A.K. GOWDA, ADV., (ABSENT)) 5 AND: 1. SMT SANAMMA W/O.REVANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2 . SRI.REVANNA S/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 R/AT GIDADAPALYA KOTHAGERE HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 3. SMT BORAMMA W/O ARALUMALLIGE AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS CHANNAVALLI COLONY HEBBUR HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 135 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.N.SHANKAR NARAYANA BHAT, ADV. FOR R1 & R2 R3 SERVED) * * * THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 29.10.2010 PASSED IN R.A. NO.66/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMKUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 22.12.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.93/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) KUNIGAL AND ETC. 6 THESE REGULAR SECOND APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellants remained absent continuously in spite of granting various adjournments by this Court. Learned counsel for the respondents has appeared continuously. This shows that the learned counsel for the appellants is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE GBB