Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 233 (CHH)

SURESH GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13894/2025 · 2026-02-19

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13894 of 2025 Suresh Gupta S/o Late Shri Chandrika Prasad Gupta Aged About 56 Years Sub Engineer, Posted At Nagar Panchayat Basan, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Urban Administration And Development Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Joint Direct Urban Administration And Development, Divisional Office, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Basana, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU) Order on Board 20/02/2026 2 1. Learned counsel for the State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that in the representation which is sought to be decided, grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was not paid increment and in the writ petition bearing WPS No. 407 of 2024, filed by the petitioner also, one of the relief is for grant of the yearly increments. In support of his contention he has relied to the Para No. 8.7 of the writ petition as also the representation submitted by the petitioner. 2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner admitted that in the earlier writ petition of the petitioner bearing WPS No. 407 of 2024, one of the relief sought is for increments for which petitioner is entitled and the writ petition is pending consideration. 3. In the aforementioned facts of the case, the second writ petition for same relief, i.e. increment would not be maintainable. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Saurabh