MOTI YADAV @ GOLDEN @ SINTU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8028/2025 · 2025-09-17
Ambuj Nath
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23299 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23299 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:28580 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8028 of 2025
-------
1. Moti Yadav @ Golden @ Sintu Kumar, aged about 18 years, son of Shashi Kumar Ray, resident of Subhkarangunj, Daulatpur, P.O. & P.S. Daulatpur, District Bhojpur, Bihar.
2. Golu Kumar @ Golu Yadav, aged about 18 years, son of Krishna Dev Ray, resident of Chitrasenpur, Daulatpur, P.O. & P.S. Daulatpur, District Bhojpur, Bihar.
…... …. Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.…. …. Opp. Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
-------- For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Paritosh Rai, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, A.P. P.
--------
02/ Dated 17.09.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 109, 118(2), 308(2)(3)(4)(5), 309(2)(3)(4)(6), 352, 351(3) & 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Sri Manish Kumar Singh, learned J.M.F.C.-XIII, Ranchi.
On 22.04.2025 at about 9:00 p.m., petitioners alongwith co-accused came to the grocery shop of the informant and started abusing him. Petitioners also opened fire upon the informant, due to which, he sustained firearm injuries.
Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is hereby rejected, at this stage.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) BS/-