CHANDRAPRAKASH GUPTA S/O LATE SHRI SHIVNARAYAN GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1613/2023 · 2025-02-05
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23295 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23295 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1613/2023 Chandraprakash Gupta S/o Late Shri Shivnarayan Gupta, Aged About 51 Years, R/o B-874, M I G Plot Shahdara New Delhi (President) Anand Dham Dharmshala, Mehandipur Balaji, Todabheem Karauli (Rajasthan) ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Superintendent Of Police, District Karauli (Rajasthan)
3. SHO, Police Station Todabheem District Karauli Rajasthan ......Non-complainant/respondent
4. Suresh Gupta S/o Shri Unknown, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 13/23 Near By Kendra Bank, New Delhi.
5. Sulesh S/o Unknown, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gali No. 5 Thansingh Nagar New Delhi. ----Accused-respondents For Complainant/ Petitioner(s) : None present For State : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/02/2025
1. The preset criminal writ petition has been filed by the complainant/petitioner for seeking direction to the respondent authority for fair and impartial investigation in the criminal case registered as F.I.R. No.0420/2022 registered with the Police Station Toda Bheem, District Karauli for the offence under Sections 380 & 506 of IPC.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant/petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:5077] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1613/2023]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that after through investigation, the Police has submitted final negative report in the matter before the concerned Magistrate.
4. In view of the fact that the Police after completion of the investigation has submitted its conclusion report before the concerned Magistrate, no further cause of action survives in the petition with regard to the prayer made in the petition.
5. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition is disposed of.
6. However, the complainant/petitioner would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law if he is not agreed to the conclusion of the investigation.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /126