Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23295 (JHR)

ALAM SIR ALIAS ALAMGIR KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4861/2025 · 2025-08-27

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:25542 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4861 of 2025 1. Alam Sir @ Alamgir Khan, son of Md. Khalil aged about 35 years, the then Branch Manager of IndusInd Bank, Jhumri Telaiya, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District-Koderma 2. Praveen Singh @ Praveen Kumar, son of Upendra Prasad Singh, aged about 44 years, Area Manager, IndusInd Bank, Jhumri Telaiya, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District-Koderma . ...... … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ramdeo Yadav, son of late Kishun Yadav, aged about 39 years, resident of village Tetariyadih, P.O. and P.S. Domchanch, District-Koderma, Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. 03/ 27.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1000/2023, registered under sections 406/420 of I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C.-XXI, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are officials of IndusInd Bank, Jhumri Telaiya. He submits that informant has taken loan and he has not paid EMI for that after notice vehicle has been re-possessed by the bank. He submits that in this background false case has been lodged by the informant alleging therein that insurance of the vehicle has not been done by the bank. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are made that due amount has been demanded by the bank. 5. Considering that petitioners are bank officials and they have ( 2025:JHHC:25542 ) re-possessed the vehicle for non payment of EMI and have no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 16 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C.-XXI, Koderma, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1000/2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-