Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23294 (RAJ)

MAHAVEER SINGH SON OF PARSADI RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/228/2025 · 2025-07-22

Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27316-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 228/2025 Mahaveer Singh Son Of Parsadi Ram, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village Lakhanpur, Tehsil Rudawal, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner (Father of Detenue) Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Sirohi. 4. SHO Police Station Abu Road Sadar, District Sirohi. ----Respondents 5. Sachin Son Of Sanjay, Resident Of Village Lakhanpur, Tehsil Rudawal, District Bharatpur (Raj.). ----Accused-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Munesh Bhardwaj, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG. Mr.Sudesh Saini, AGA. Mr.Bhuri Singh, ASI and Ms.Nainu Kumari, MFC 1027, Police Station Abu Road Sardar District Sirohi. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 22/07/2025 1. This petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus was filed by the father for production of her daughter-detenue. 2. Vide order dated 14.07.2025 learned AGA sought time to produce the corpus. [2025:RJ-JP:27316-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-228/2025] 3. The detenue is produced in Court as identified by her father who is identified by his counsel and concerned Police officials who are also present in Court. 4. We have interacted with the detenue and she has desired to go with her father. The father of the detenue is also ready to take the detenue along with him. 5. It is not disputed by both the parties that the detenue has attained majority. The custody of the detenue is handed over henceforth to the petitioner-father. 6. In view of the above, no further order is called for. The petition stands disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL), J (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J Himanshu Soni/C-1