BAHADUR PRASAD VERMA ALIAS BAHADUR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4914/2025 · 2025-08-28
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23294 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23294 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:25836 ] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4914 of 2025
Bahadur Prasad Verma @ Bahadur Verma, Son of Kartik Mahto, aged about- 63 years, Resident of village- Gumo, Damobir Muhalla, P.O.- Jhumri Telaiya, P.S.- Telaiya, District- Koderma.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P.
------
03/ 28.08.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Koderma.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the informant has lodged the case alleging therein that one Dilip Prasad Verma has demanded Rs. 10 lakhs for allowing the informant to remain on the land in question. He submits that petitioner is the brother of said Dilip Prasad Verma and he has executed the sale deed in favour of the informant. He further submits that the allegation of demand is not against the present petitioner.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is the brother of Dilip Prasad Verma.
5.
Considering that one Dilip Prasad Verma has made a demand of Rs. 10 lakhs from the informant and this petitioner has executed the sale deed in favour of the informant and the allegation of
[2025:JHHC:25836 ] -2-
demand is not against the present petitioner, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby
directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Special Judge, A.C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-