A APHC010328542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16630 OF 2025 Between: Konanki Venkateswarlu,, S/o.Late Anjaiah, Aged 75 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Kolachakota Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.By its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. Station House Officer, Maddipadu Police Station, Maddipadu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. Konanki Anusha, Theatre Assistant, RIMS Hospital, Ongole City, Prakasam District. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus the action of the respondents particularly the 4th respondent interfering in the civil dispute, calling the more petitioner to police station by the influence of 5th respondent and pressurized to settle his RCC house dispute between the petitioner and 5th respondent without there being any authority of law, which is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violative of Principles of Natural Justice, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.02.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in civil dispute and not to call the petitioner to the Police Station, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010328542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) •I [3457] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16630/2025 Between: 1.KONANKI VENKATESWARLU,, S/0.LATE ANJAIAH, YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AGED 75 R/O.KOLACHAKOTA VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. HOME DEPARTMENT, 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR. PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3,SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADDIPADU POLICE STATION MADDIPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5.KONANKI ANUSHA, THEATRE ASSISTANT, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. RIMS HOSPITAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): m V' 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16630/2025 ORDER: - Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is struggling by the actions of respondent No.4 at the behest of respondent No.5 and is being repeatedly called to the police station and respondent No.4 is forcing the petitioner to execute sale deed pertaining to RCC house in favour of respondent No.5. 1. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on certain instructions submits that there are three crimes i.e., Cr.No.119 of 2024 under section 498A IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the DP Act and Cr.No.39 of 2025 under sections 74, 115(2) read with 3(5) BNS and Cr.No.132 of 2025 under sections 79,115(2) read with 3(5) BNS of Maddipadu Police Station which were filed by the respondent No.5 against the petitioner and that respondent No.5 is an accused in Cr.No.26 of 2025 under sections 115(2) and 118(1) of the BNS which was filed by the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is only called to the police station for the purpose of enquiry. 3. Based on the above submissions, it is made clear that the respondent No.4 shall not disturb the peace of the petitioner except by following due process of law. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shaj|f_^tand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// %- SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 4. The Station House Officer, Maddipad Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 5. One CC to Sri. Naga Praveen Vankayalapati Advocate [OPUC] 6. TwoCCsto GP for Home High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. TwoCCsto GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies Police Station, Maddipadu u GSC HIGH COURT DATE 0:07/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 16630 OF 2025 ^ U0I139?; iu9iino o szoj inr III UD ■^fANDH^ X 1IJUL2025 I Current Secuon ^ ^ DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS