SRI R S BABU NAIDU v. KARNATAKA SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES
CRP/250/2025 · 2025-04-21
R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23284 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23284 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16201 CRP No. 250 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 250 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI R S BABU NAIDU S/O S.R. SEETARAM, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S TYRE WORKS, PLOT NO.L-9, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MADIKERI-571 201, KODAGU DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.K. BHAT., SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. SUDHA D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
KARNATAKA SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 044, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
KARNATAKA STATE SMALL INDUSTRIES
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16201 CRP No. 250 of 2025
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, YADAVAGIRI, MYSUURU-570 020, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER.
3.
M/S. COORG TYRE WORKS, A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, REP. BY SRI G.E. NIRANJAN, S/O SRI ESHWAR, PROPRIETOR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.3/98, ALANKAR HOUSE, DASAVALA BADAVANE, MADIKERI, COORG DISTRICT-571201.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.11.2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.V IN OS.NO.8/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADIKERI, ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.V FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) OF CPC, FOR REJECTION OF SUIT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16201 CRP No. 250 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER Learned Senior Counsel Sri G.K.Bhat, appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that the Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable in view of the rejection of the plaint and an appeal is required to be filed. Therefore at the request of the learned Senior Counsel, the Civil Revision Petition is permitted to be withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal.
2. Needless to observe that the time spent by the petitioner before this court in this Civil Revision Petition shall be taken into consideration when the petitioner seeks condonation of delay in the appeal that would be filed. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL