1 2025:CGHC:4671 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2014 of 2019 • Shri Shyam Indane Through Proprietor / Partner Vishal Kedia S/o Shri Santosh Agrawal Aged About 31 Years, R/o Opp. Mission Hospital, Barpali Chowk, Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Raipur Area Office Through Chief Area Manager, Rajiv Gandhi, Marg, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Area Manager Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Raipur, Area Office Rajiv Gandhi Marg Telibandha Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Area Manager Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. Champa Indane Through Proprietor Amit Jaiswal S/o Kamal Kishore Jaiswal, Gali No. 2, Bhartiya Nagar, Basera Colony, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Triapathi, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate Mr. Himanshu Sinha, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27/01/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be quashed the advertisement dated 14.08.2017 (Annexure P/1) relates to distributorship of LPG at Champa Shehari Rurban Area and the letter of LOA dated 04.10.2018 (Annexure P/2) as well as the subsequent appointed the respondent no. 4 as a new distributor at Champa Shehari Rurban Area. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.2 That, the respondent no. 1 to 3 may kindly be directed not to transfer the consumers of the petitioner to the Champa Indane. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.” 2. Mr. Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the dispute involved in the present petition has already been settled between the parties. He seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti