Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23282 (CHH)

NANDLAL RATHOUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1679/2025 · 2025-06-09

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1679 of 2025 1 - Nandlal Rathour S/o Ramprasad Rathour Aged About 19 Years R/o Ward No. 10 Samantpur, Chachai Raod Pataura Tola, Thana Anuppur, District- Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Basna, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 10.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 04.07.2024 passed in MCRC No. 2672 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Nandlal Rathour had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS) Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 28.04.2025 has VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.06.16 12:21:27 +0530 2 requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in the present case, the statements of 03 prosecution witnesses have already recorded by the previous Presiding Officer and 10 witnesses are remained to be examined. Considering the numbers of witnesses, the trial is likely to take some more time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of six months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali