HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29521 of 2025 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.143 out of 259) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. As informed by learned State Law Officer, notice to the informant has been served on 26.08.2025, but none is present on behalf of the informant. 2. Heard Ms. Gunjan Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Special Sessions Trial No.361 of 2024 (State vs. Priyanshu) arising out of Case Crime No.321 of 2024, under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) IPC and Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Gajraula, District- Amroha, during the pendency of trial. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that the statement of the victim recorded u/s 183 BNSS prima facie indicates her consent, as she had gone with the applicant all the way to Noida from Amroha and stayed there for 20 days. As per the ossification test report, the victim is 17 years old. In view of the judgments of the Supreme Court in Jaya Mala Vs. State of J & K, (1982) 2 SCC 538 and Mohd. Imran Khan vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), (2011) 10 SCC 192,, it has been held that the opinion of a radiologist regarding age is not exact and carries a margin of error of 1–2 years on either side. Furthermore, there is no medical evidence on record to corroborate the alleged incident. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gunjan Sharma, Sandeep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pranshu Urf Priyanshu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Pranshu Urf Priyanshu, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. April 23, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 29521 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad