1 APHC010328322015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 22595/2015 Between: M/s. G.g.r Housing India Pvt Ltd., ...PETITIONER AND Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR (SC FOR VMRDA and MUDA) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the layout for Survey No.124/p, 127/1, 2, 128/3, 72, 74/1, 2, 75/1, 2, 3, 76, 77 of Polipalle Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District in an extent of Ac. 49.70 cents, as illegal, null, void and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to release the approved layout to the Petitioner and to pass…” 2. When the matter came up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, has furnished a copy of the written instructions of the Chief Urban Planner, VMRDA, dated 22.01.2025. Wherein it was stated that the petitioner developed the subject approved layout vide L.P.No.88 of 2015 as per norms and also submitted the NALA proceedings vide RC.No.1532 of 2015, dated 26.11.2015; 2102 of 2015, dated 25.01.2016; 2101 of 2015/C, dated 25.01.2016. Consequently, the mortgaged plots of the subject layout were released by office vide proceedings Rc.No.2541 of 2015/L8, and the same was communicated to the petitioner though a letter dated 04.12.2021, vide Rc.No.2541/2015/L8 (e-209711). 3. In view of the fact that the authorities have already released the approved layout vide proceedings Rc.No.2541 of 2015/L8, and 3 communicated the same to the petitioner through a letter dated 04.12.2021, this Court is of the opinion that no cause survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infrctuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 23.01.2025 ANS 4 293 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 22595/2015 Date: 23.01.2025 ANS