[2025:RJ-JP:30092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8471/2025 Jitendra S/o Roop Singh, R/o Gangrapada, Mahadev Gali, Town Bayana, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (Ac- cused Presently Confined At District Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajsthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank with Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.699/2014 registered at Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 302 & 427 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that during the course of investigation, no case was made out against the petitioner and charge-sheet was filed against the co-accused persons. Counsel submits that in exercise of powers under Section 319 of Cr.PC, petitioner was summoned as additional accused through warrant of arrest. Counsel submits that in pursuance of warrant of arrest, petitioner moved an application for bail before the learned trial Court however, same was rejected. Counsel [2025:RJ-JP:30092] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8471/2025] submits that co-accused persons namely Pappu @ Dalchand, Naresh, Ashok Kumar, Bhullan, Pushpendra, Roop Singh, Hari Shankar, Suresh Chand, Mahesh Chand, Bhura, Sunil @ Gujarmal & Saurabh have already been granted benefit of bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that aforesaid co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Jitendra S/o Roop Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to [2025:RJ-JP:30092] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8471/2025] which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN ), J LALIT MOHAN /208