Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18311 CRL.P No. 5241 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5241 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS) BETWEEN:
SRI. RAGHU.S @ RAGHAVENDRA S/O. SHIVANNA. S.S.
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, BAPUJI BADAVANE, HONNURU, MALESHETTY VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 556. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY MULKI POLICE STATION, MANGALORE - 574 154.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO GRANT REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT MULKI POLICE STATION, MANGALURU, TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO THE S.C.NO.5/2024 (CR.NO.84/2023) FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/US/ 397, 395 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MANGALURU.
Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18311 CRL.P No. 5241 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking regular bail in S.C No.5/2024 (Crime No.84/2023 of the respondent - police) pending on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge at Mangaluru. Factual matrix of the case:
2. It is the case of the prosecution that, Smt.Vasanthi Shetty is a resident of Bellayuru Village residing along with her husband. On 17.09.2023, she had been to medical stores to bring the medicines. After returning to her home, an unknown person came to her house and requested her to give an empty bottle to get the petrol filled. Again, around 12.30 p.m., the said person came to the house and requested her that he wanted a small bottle instead of big bottle. When the complainant tried to go inside the house to bring the bottle, two persons were standing in the side, immediately, showed the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18311 CRL.P No. 5241 of 2025
knife and took her 40 grams gold chain along with Karimani sara. Thereafter, they went away from the spot.
3. After the incident, she lodges a complaint before the respondent - police in respect of the incident. The respondent - police registered a case in Crime No.84/2023. After conducting investigation, submitted the charge sheet.
4. Heard Sri.V.B.Siddaramaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Vinay Mahadevaiah, learned HCGP for the respondent – State.
5. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences. They are in need of medical assistance. The examination of material witnesses is over. They may be enlarged on bail by imposing suitable conditions. Making such submissions, the
learned counsel for the petitioner prays to allow the petition.
6. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent - State submitted that this is a successive bail application. In earlier round of litigation, the same relief was sought by the petitioner and it has been rejected. Therefore, it is not appropriate to grant any relief as
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18311 CRL.P No. 5241 of 2025
prayed for till examination of all the witnesses. Making such
submissions, the learned HCGP prays to dismiss the petition.
7. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and also perused the order of the Co-ordinate Bench relating to rejecting the bail petition of the petitioner. After having gone through the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that it is not a fit case to grant bail.
8. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER The petition is rejected. However, it is directed the Trial Court to expedite the trial and complete the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Trial Court forthwith. Sd/-
(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
SMC/UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30 CT:SK