Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23274 (AP)

Mareedu Prasad v. Srihari Babu

CC/1260/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010328562020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1260/2020 Between: 1. MAREEDU PRASAD, S/O PARASURAMAIAH AGED 61YRS, OCC GOD S SERVANT (PASTOR) R/O SIYONU PRAYER HOUSE JAMIGOLVEPALLI VILLAGE, PAMARRU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. CHEELI VEERACHARYULU, S/O SUBBAIAH (LATE) AGED ABOUT 69YRS, R/O 11/207, PLOT NO.202 BHARGAVE RESIDENCY KOGANTIVARI STREET, GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. PALLEM SRINIVASARAO, S/O NEELAMBRAM AGED ABOUT 50YRS, R/O D.NO.11/138, BESIDE MORE SUPER MARKET GVR STREET, ELURU ROAD GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. GANTA SURESH KUMAR, S/O SIMON AGED ABOUT 45YRS R/O H.NO.403, BOPPANAS SAI RAM RESIDENCY GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRIHARI BABU, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE - CUM - SHO PAMARRU POLICE STATION KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. DHARMENDRA, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. RAVINDRANATH BABU, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. BONTHALA TIMOTHI, S/O RAMACHANDRAIAH CHETTY AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,R/O H.NO.36 B.BLOCK TIRUMALA TOWERSA,GOLCONDA X ROADS MUSHEERABAD,HYDERABAD HYDERABAD 5. RAGI VEERACHARY, S/O NARASAIAH AGED BAOUT 55 YEARS R/O FLAT NO.304 VENKATA SAI APARTMENTS SANTOSH NAGAR,MIRYALAGUDA NALGONDA DISTRICT 6. MEDIPALLI SUVARNA RAJU, S/O BHUSHANAM AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O OLD INDIAN GAS AGENCY ROAD ELURU 2 ROAD,GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 7. SUDHAKAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PEITTIONER AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS C/O SURVANA RAJU OLD INIDAN GAS AGENCY ROAD ELURU ROAD,GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case, under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt Act, 1971 is filed by the petitioner for willful disobedience in obeying/complying the order dated 02.11.2020 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.20128 of 2020. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no orders are required in this matter. 3. Considering the submissions made and since there is no element of contempt of orders passed by this Court, the Contempt Case is closed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA C.C.No.1260 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr