[2025:RJ-JP:212] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 273/2015 1. Saddik Khan Son of Shri Haji Bashir Ahmed, aged 30 years, Resident of Village Gulpada, P.S. Sikri, District Bharatpur. 2. Reshma Bano Wife of Saddik Khan, aged 21 years, Resident of Village Gulpada, P.S. Sikri, District Bharatpur. 3. Mohd. Jaid Son of Saddik Khan, aged 04 months, minor through guardian father Saddik Khan Son of Shri Haji Bashir Ahmed, Resident of Village Gulpada, P.S. Sikri, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur. 3. S.H.O. Police Station Sikri, District Bharatpur. 4. Anjuman Wife of Saddik Khan Daughter of Sahib Khan @ Chini, Resident of Gulpada, P.S. Sikri, At present Village Ladamka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. 5. Noor Mohammed @ Suka Son of Sufeda 6. Hakam Son of Noor Mohammed Suka 7. Muharu Son of Sufeda, 8. Asam Son of Muharu 9. Majid Son of Mislu 10. Mislu Son of Asin 11. Apsana Wife of Shri Hakam Respondents No.5 to 11, Resident of Village Gulpada, P.S. Sikri, District Bharatpur. 12. Rasheed Son of Phajjar, Resident of Kutakpur, P.S. Nagar, at present Gulpada, P.S. Sikri, District Bharaptur. 13. Saheb Khan @ Chini Son of Jhuhru Khan, Resident of Ladamka, P.S. Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. 14. Taufeeq Son of Saheb Khan @ Chini, Resident of Ladamka, P.S. Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. 15. Arif Son of Saheb Khan @ Chini, Resident of Ladamka, P.S. Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:212] (2 of 2) [CRLW-273/2015] For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/01/2025 1. By way of filing of this petition, the petitioners are seeking directions against the State-respondents for providing protection from the private respondents. 2. The instant petition was preferred way back in the year 2015, thereafter, more than nine years have passed, now the apprehension of danger is not there, hence, under these circumstances, the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. The criminal writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/311