Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body
2025 DAILYLAW 23273 (AP)
Januguri Chantibabu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/6749/2025 · 2025-07-09
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23273 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23273 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
..I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA`S¥ THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SR] JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO / CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6749 OF 2025 / Betwee n : Januguri Chantibabu, S/o. Ramarao, aged about 32 Years, R/o. Diguva Jenaba Village, Balapam Panchayat, ChintapaIIi Mandal, Alluri Seetha Jj' Rama Raju District i+as ,, I..petitioner/Accused A-2 AND The State of Andhra PradeSh:, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh `At Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023, is filed praying that in the cI'rCumStanCeS Stated in the grounds filed in Support Of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be b'leased to release the petitl-oner/Accused-2 on bail in crime no. 93 of 2024-J`6n file of the Koyyuru Police Station under section 111(2)(b) of BNSS 2023,~ 20(B)(ii)©, 28 R/w 8© of NDPS Act 1985 dated 29.09.2024. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support there6|f and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju,'Advocate for the Petitioner and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following ... -___--I APHCO10328762025 E.HE lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6749 OF 2025 [3369] Between:
1.JANUGURI CHANTIBABU, S/O. RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. DIGUVA JENABA VILLAGE, BALAPAM PANCHAYAT, CHINTAPALLI MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT H.PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati. ".RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS Praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to release the Petitioner/Accused-2 on bail in crime no. 93 of 2024 on file of the Koyyuru Police Station under section Ill(2)(b) of BNSS 2023, 2O(B)(ii)<c), 25 R/w 8(c) of NDPS Act 1985 dated 29-09-2024 and pass Counsel for t'he petitioner/accused:
1. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/See.480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/A2, seeking bail, in Crime No.93/2O24 of Koyyuru Police`Station, Alluri Sitharama Raju District.
2
2. A case has been reg'is{ered against the petitioner and others for the offences punishable u/sees.111(2)(b) of the B.N.S., 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 r/w 8(c) of the NDPS Act. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant public prosecutor representing the respondent/state. 4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 29.9.2024 at 4.OOpm, on receipt of credible information, regarding illegal possession and transportation of ganja, the S.I of Police, along with staff and mediators rushed to Gudlapalli Village outskirts of Koyuru MandaI, and conducted vehicle checking. At that time one auto bearing registration no.AP 31 TE 9823 was coming towards them and on seeing police, the auto turned back and tried to escape. Then police chased and apprehended four persons in auto and on enquiry, they disclosed their identity particulars as that of A3 to A6 and police found 110kgs of ganJ'a in their possession. Police seized the contraband and other material and arrested the accused. They confessed the involvement of the petitioner/A2 and other accused in the commission of the offence. During the Course of investigation, police arrested the \+`` petitioner/A2 on 23.5.2025. ```|\_ I iI I=
5. Perused the record. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a crime came to be registered on 29.9.2024 and basing on the confession statement of other accused, who were found to be in possession of 110 Kgs of Ganja, this EEiTEEE£EL iis\is` I+* I \ -
a_ _, -rf 3 petitioner on execution of ,pT warrant, the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 23.5.2025, as such, prayed to allow the criminal petition. 7. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not disputed the above fact and opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that one antecedent has been reported as against the petitioner herein. 8.
After careful observation of the material on record and submissions made on behalf of both sides, I't Shows that On eXeCu.lion Of PT warrant the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.5.2025 basing on the confession statement of co-accused. Evident'yJ nO contraband has been seized from the possession of the petitioner. since the petitioner has been in remand from 23.5.2025, this Court found that most of the investigation pertaining to the role played by the petitioner in the commission of the offence would be completed. It is submitted that the Petitioner iS a Permanent resident Of Balapam PanchayatJ there iS nO possibility of his fleeing away from justice and most of the witnesses are official witnesses and the release of the petitioner would not cause tampering of evidence and hampering of investigation. considering the entire material on re.cord, this .Cou~ri is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner -/ with som'e conditions. 9. - ln the result, the criminal Petition is allowed with the following conditions: (i) The petitioner/A2 hereih shall be released on his executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned I raz2'
tJ>Jt To, // / 4 Additional District & sessions Judge-Gum-Special Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam,I (ii) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned once in a fortnight between lO.OOam and 01.00 pm, for a period of three (o3) months. (iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence and hamper the investigation and shall cooperate for investigation. 7 __------ I Sci,jq SK. l#-iF.*[ i3`AF:i //TRUE COPY// ASnSa!.S'TAEtiT' Ets`E. SEJ`+;urE#:`jFtl grjFF§eyEF.F?I
1. The Special Judge for Trial of cases under NDPS Act-Gum-I Additional Sessl'ons Judge, vI-Sakhapatnam. 2. The Superintendent, central prison, vI-Sakhapatnam. 3. The Station House officer, Koyyuru police Station, AIIuri Seetha Rama Raju D]'strict. 4. One CC to Sri Kakumanu JojI-Amrutha Raju, Advocate [opuc]
5. Two ccs topuBLIC PROSECUTOR, High court of A.P., AmaravatI'. [OUT] it,u
6. One spare copy. PSD -,s5~ _ --_`
HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED:10/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6749 of 2025 ALLOWED 10 JuLZOffi \