Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23272 (HP)

BALBIR SINGH S/o Sh. Ram Singh v. NIPUN JINDAL

COPC/930/2025 · 2025-09-04

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.930 of 2025 Date of Decision: 04.09.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Balbir Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Shwetima Dogra, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 03.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Dy. Divisional Manager, HRTC, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, which is taken on record, Ms. Shwetima Dogra, learned vice counsel for the respondent, states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, this Court finds that sum of Rs.15,89,709/- and sum of Rs.9,63,460/- stand paid to the petitioner on account of DCRG and Leave Encashment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that now only amount remains to be paid is on account of interest for the delayed payment. Learned vice counsel representing the respondent states 2 that interest amount, if not already paid, shall be paid to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within four months from today. 4. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are disposed of with a direction to the respondent to ensure that payment, if any, on account of interest shall be paid expeditiously, preferably within four months from today, failing which, he would aggravate the contempt and petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken against the erring officials. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. September 04, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge