Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23270 (GAU)

MR. VIGHOTO CHISHI v. C. ALEM SANGTAM AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/130/2025 · 2025-08-12

Mridul Kumar Kalita, Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020004242025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/130/2025 MR. VIGHOTO CHISHI SON OF LATE GHOKUTO CHISHI R/O H.NO. 63 SITIMI VILLAGE KIPHIRE NAGALAND VERSUS C. ALEM SANGTAM AND 4 ORS R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE NAGALAND 2:STATE OF NAGALAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF NAGALAND 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DIRECTORATE OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:THE DIRECTOR DEPT. OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY KOHIMA NAGALAND 5:SHRI N. ATOVI SEMA R/O SITIMI VILLAGE KIPHIRE NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : A. ZHIMOMI Advocate for : appearing for C. ALEM SANGTAM AND 4 ORS Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 13-08-2025 (M.K.Kalita,J) Heard Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the applicant. This application under Rule 76 (d) of the Chapter 5 of the Gauhati High Court Rules, has been made by the applicant, namely, Mr. Vighoto Chishi, seeking leave to prefer the appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.05.2025 passed in WP(C)/193/2021. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the petitioner was not made a party in the said writ petition, however, he has been affected by the impugned order, therefore, he seeks leave to prefer the connected appeal. Considering the grounds stated in the application for seeking leave to file an appeal as stated herein above, we hereby dispense with the notice to the opposite parties and grant the leave which has been sought for, subject to the law of limitation. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant