\ APHC010328232002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 92 OF 2002 Appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree in A.S. No. 23/95 dated; 2"^ day of November 2001 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. Between: Polagana Satyanarayana, S/o Venkata, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District. aged 52 years, Muddapuram ...PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/APPELLANT VS 1. Chitikina Narasimha Murfhy, S/o Ramanna, R/0 Venkatapalem D.M.C., West Godavari District. 2. Chitikina Venkateswara Rao, S/o Ramanna, R/o Venkataypalem, Kovvur D.M.C.,West Godavari District. 3. Chitikina Subbarayudu, S/o Narasanna. (Died) 4. Chitikina Ramanna, S/o Narasanna. (Died) 5. Chitikina Anjanna, S/o Ramanna, Minor rep by Court Guardian, Sri K.K Haranath Pentapadu, Tadapalligudem D.M.C., West Godavari District. (Appeal Against RR5,8,10 disd for default Vide Co dated 09/03/2011) , Kovvur 6. Chitikina Venkayamma, W/o Ramanna. (Died) 7. Meka Nagamani, W/o Swarajya Rao. R/o Venkatayapalem D.M.C., West Godavari District. 8. Bolla DhanaLakshmi, W/o Suryanarayana, Venkataypalem D.M.C West Godavari District. 9. Kotia Musalamma W/o Venkata Rao, Koyyalagudem D.M.C.,West Godavari District. , Kovvur , Kovvur , Kovvur 10. Chitikina Krishnamma, D/o Late Ramanna. being minor rep by Court Guardian Sri K.K.Haranath, Pentapadu, Tadepalligudem D.M.C ...DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS : SRI SANKU DURGA RAMACHANDRA Counsel for the Petitioner RAO Counsel for the Respondents : SRI K V L NARASIMHA The Court made the following JUDGMENT : RAO APHC010328232002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 92 OF 2002 Between: 1. POLAGANA SATYANARAYANA WG DIST, - ...Petitioner AND 1. C NARASIMHA MURTY 9, - ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: 1.SANKU DURGA RAMACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1.KVL NARASIMHA RAO The Court made the following: 1/ > ■ ! THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.92 OF 2002 JUDGMENT: Sri M.Johnson Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Sanku Durga Ramachandra Rao, learned counsel for the appellant present and sought time. 2. Sri K.V.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 3. Considering the circumstances, it appears that the appellant is not coming forward to prosecute the appeal, though the matter is adjourned from time to time at the request of the appellant, and finally posted under the caption ‘for Dismissal’. 4. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall SDI- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. (with records) 2. One CC to SRI. SANKU DURGA RAMACHANDRA [OPUC] RAO Advocate 3. One uu to SRi. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies at Chp TAC HIGH COURT DATED:08/07/2025 ORDER SA NO. 92 OF 2002 ^ 17 JUL 2025 '(S DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON PROSECUTION