Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23264 (AP)

BANDI SAHADEVAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/16488/2025 · 2025-07-06

Harinath N

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010328132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16488/2025 Between: 1. BANDI SAHADEVAIAH, S/O. RAMADASU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. YELLAMPALLE, H/O. KORLAKUNTA, KALIKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. BANDI SAROJAMMA,, W/O. SAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. YELLAMPALLE, H/O. KORLAKUNTA, KALIKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALIKIRI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. DEVARA MANOHA, , S/O. VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. YELLAMPETA, H/O. KORLAKUNTA, KALKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. CHANDRAKALA, W/O. VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. YELLAMPETA, H/O. KORLAKUNTA KALKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. KUMAR, , S/O. NOT KNOWN, R/O. YELLAMPETA, H/O. KORLAKUNTA KALKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 7. T VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. YELLAMPETA, H/O. KORLAKUNTA, KALKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction of the police in implementing the decree passed in O.S.No.236 of 2018 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Vayalpadu, dated 08.04.2019. 2. It is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that no representation has been received by the 3rd respondent from the petitioners. However, representations have been made to the Tahsildar and the District Collector. 3. Considering the same, it is open to the petitioners to submit a fresh representation to the 3rd respondent and the 3rd respondent on receipt of such representation shall ensure the compliance of the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.236 of 2018 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Vayalpadu, dated 08.04.2019, subject to any further orders from the appellate Courts. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 07.07.2025 SR