- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2200 RFA No. 970 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2023 (RES) BETWEEN: MASTER V.NIKHIL S/O VASANTHA, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REP.BY HIS FATHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN, SRI.VASANTHA, S/O LATE ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT KITHAGANATHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 118. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. NAGAMMA W/O LATE ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT KITHAGANATHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 118. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2200 RFA No. 970 of 2023 ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 20.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35