1 2025:CGHC:22354-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2660 of 2025 1 - M/s Shrikishan And Company Private Limited Registered Office At 4/12, 2nd Floor, Shree Tower , Dr. Verma Nursing Home Street, Shanti Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) - 492007 Through Its Authorized Representative Mr. Sharad Goyal Aged About 34 Years S/o Shri Sushil Agrawal ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Water Resources Department Hasdeo Basin, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) - 495001 2 - Executive Engineer Water Resources Division, Korba (C.G.) - 495677 3 - Superintending Engineer Water Resources Circle, Korba (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer (Tender Cell) O/o EinC, Shivnath Bhawan North Block, Sector - 19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar Water Resources Department (C.G.) - 492101 5 - Chief Engineer Water Resources Department, Hasdeo Basin , Water Resources Department Bilaspur (C.G.) - 495001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 27.5.2025 1. Heard Mr. Kshitij Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP 2 Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayer: a. Restraining respondents from continuing the tender process, including issuance Letter of Award (LOA) of the said tender bearing NIT No.07/SAC/e- procurement/20245-25 dated 08.01.2025, pending the final disposal of the writ petition. b. Stay the effect and operation of Letter of Award (LOA) of the tender bearing NIT No.07/ SAC/e-procurement/2024-25 dated 08.01.2025 by also restraining the execution of work, in case the same has been issued to any bidder, pending the final disposal of the writ petition. c. Pass such other and further orders as may be deemed just and proper in the interest of justice. 3. At the out, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition, with liberty to file afresh, if occasion so arises in future with respect to the academic question involved in the matter. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents/State has no objection on aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) (Ramesh Sinha) (Judge) Chief Justice Bini