Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2326 (UTT)

NISAR AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/210/2023 · 2025-03-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.210 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the parties that they got no instructions, in the matter. 5. In view of the statement so made, by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is dismissed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.03.2025 SK