Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2326 (RAJ)

JITENDRA KUMAR JAIN S/O SHRI BABU LAL JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/194/2025 · 2025-01-09

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1415] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 194/2025 Jitendra Kumar Jain S/o Shri Babu Lal Jain, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Vardhman Nagar, Hindaun City District Karauli At Present Working As Teacher Grade III Level-2 At Government Upper Primary School Bad Ka Pura, Block Hindaun City District Karauli ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Secondary / Elementary Education, Bikaner 3. District Education Officer (Head Quarter), Elementary Education, Karauli 4. Chief Block Education Officer, Block Hindaun City District Karaul ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Gupta for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 09/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner herein was one of the petitioners in the order dated 10.09.2012 marked as Annexure-2. The said bunch of petitions were adjudicated and disposed of by the learned RAT vide order dated 18.12.2024, wherein it was directed that the aggrieved persons can file a representation before the competent authority and the same be adjudicated by way of a speaking order, within a stipulated period. [2025:RJ-JP:1415] (2 of 2) [CW-194/2025] It is further submitted that vide the petitioners herein had duly submitted a representation (Annexure-5) before the competent authority however no speaking order is passed till date. Learned counsel Mr. Rahul Gupta appearing on behalf of Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG has marked attendance for the respondents and has submitted that the directions spelled out in the order dated 18.12.2024 shall be complied with by the appropriate authority i.e. Chief Block Education Officer, or else appropriate course of contempt proceedings might be adopted. Therefore, considering the foregoing facts and circumstances and taking note of the consensus drawn inter-se between the parties, this Court directs the Chief Block Education Officer to direct the said representation within a period of two weeks from the date of passing of the present order, by way of a speaking order. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/10