Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29101] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8465/2025
1. Alim Khan S/o Jakar Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Tatabas Police Station Sikri District Deeg, Currently Imprisoned In District Jail Alwar. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Alwar).
2. Farin Khan S/o Aasu, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kurkaniya Bas Police Station Sikri District Deeg, Currently Imprisoned In District Jail Alwar. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajsthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 31/07/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 207/2025 registered at Police Station Govindgarh Alwar, District Alwar for the offence punishable under Section 66C of IT Act and Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2)(A) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. It is
[2025:RJ-JP:29101] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8465/2025] contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioners are in custody since 12.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody; absence of criminal antecedents, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners-Alim Khan S/o Jakar Khan and Farin Khan S/o Aasu shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall
[2025:RJ-JP:29101] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8465/2025] mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for compliance. 10.
If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 11. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/329