Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.14112 of 2024
Decided on: 10th January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________
Rekha Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Anr
…..Respondents. ______________________________________________________
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Dheeraj K.Verma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta and Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocates General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 2 - her grievances raised in the writ petition.
3.
Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge January 10, 2025 R.Atal