Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23258 (RAJ)

RAJESH@RAJENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

CRLR/907/2015 · 2025-05-16

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20816] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 907/2015 Rajesh @Rajendra S/o Ramu @ Ramlal, R/o Village Fatehpura (Bansa), Police Station Samod, Tehsil Chaumu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through the learned Public Prosecutor 2. Shiv Prasad Singh S/o Shri G.D. Singh, R/o Murlipura Scheme Jaipur District Jaipur, At present posted at Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vijaya Laxmi Gautam for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta with Mr. Shyam Sundar Mr. Devi Singh, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/05/2025 1. Service complete. 2. Aggrieved from order dated 10.06.2015 in Criminal Revision No.34/2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chomu, District Jaipur, instant revision petition is preferred by petitioner- complainant. The petitioner-complainant has challenged the order dated 10.06.2015, whereby the order of cognizance dated 07.11.2013 was set aside and matter was remitted back to the Trial Court for passing a fresh order at the stage of cognizance after taking note of provision under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. 2. Aggrieved from same impugned order dated 10.06.2015 in another Revision No.48/2014 passed by same Court, a S.B. [2025:RJ-JP:20816] (2 of 2) [CRLR-907/2015] Criminal Revision Petition No.906/2015 was filed by complainant and same was dismissed by office on 19.03.2025 in compliance of order dated 25.01.2024. 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Trial Court be directed to pass appropriate order at earliest without being influenced from order dated 10.06.2015 passed by learned Revisional Court. Learned counsel for respondent has no objection in such direction. 4. Having considered the submission, the revision petition is disposed of with direction to learned Trial Court to pass appropriate order in compliance of order dated 10.06.2015 but without being influenced from order dated 10.06.2015. 5. With aforesaid, the revision petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /59