[2025:RJ-JP:30121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8475/2025 Vivek @ Udham S/o Shyamlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bhi- nora, Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.46/2025 registered at Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 352, 324(5), 109(1) & 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that all the injuries sustained to the injured persons are simple in nature. Counsel submits that a simple accidental case has been converted into serious criminal offence. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.05.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:30121] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8475/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that injuries sustained to the injured are simple in nature; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Vivek @ Udham S/o Shyamlal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN ), J LALIT MOHAN /209