- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6096 CRP No. 493 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 493 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENKATARAMA S/O LATE THIMMIAH @ CHINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT GANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. 2. SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O HALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT SRI RAGHURAMAPURA VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. 3. SMT SUSHEELAMMA W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT KAVADIHALLI, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. 4. SMT PUTTALAKSHMI W/O NANJUNDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6096 CRP No. 493 of 2018 R/AT KARIKYATHANAHALLI, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANAGALA TALUK-571432. 5. SRI MURALI S/O LATE THIMMIAH @ CHINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. SRI RAJAKUMARA S/O LATE THIMMIAH @ CHINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS PETITIONER NO.5 & 6 ARE R/AT GANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NANJUNDA SWAMY N., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. PUTTALAKSHMAMMA W/O NANJAPPA, R/AT GANGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK-571432. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.SURESH KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. CHANDINI S., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2018 PASSED ON IA IX IN OS.NO.298/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA, REJECTING THE IA FILED U/O 7 RULE 11 OF CPC REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6096 CRP No. 493 of 2018 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.298/2011 was dismissed as abated on 20.08.2022. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL