Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23252 (KAR)

SMT. KEMPAMMA, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/10068/2023 · 2025-06-12

E S Indiresh

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20159 WP No. 10068 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.10068 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KEMPAMMA, W/O LATE GANGADHARA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2. SRI. G. SIDDARAJA, W/O LATE GANGADHARA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT CHAGALATTI VILLAGE, JALAHOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 149. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA M.S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU -560 001 REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KADNAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20159 WP No. 10068 of 2023 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH ADDL. TALUK, BENGALURU, NOW YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 063. 5. SMT. SARASWATHI, W/O LATE.SRI.RAMGARAO, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 6. SRI.B.L.NARAYAN S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 7. SRI. C.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O B.L.NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 8. KUM. V.N.CHANDANA, D/O B.L.NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS. 6 TO 8 ARE R/AT, NO.59/A, A AND B BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, MYSURU - 570 001. 9. SRI. C.A. ASWATHANARAYANA, S/O LATE RANGARAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20159 WP No. 10068 of 2023 10. SRI.C.R.NAGESH, S/O LATE RANGARAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS. 5, 9 & 10 ARE R/AT CHAGALATTI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU -562 149. 11. SRI.RAGHURAM S/O LATE RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT GOPASANDA VILLAGE, IKHSAPURA POST, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; R6 TO R8 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 04.04.2016 IN APPEAL NO.718/2011 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL DEVNAHALLI TALUK AT DEVANAHALLI IN NO. LRF.3/1974-75 DATED 16.07.1981 ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20159 WP No. 10068 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for quashing of the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.719 of 2011 (Annexure-A) and order passed by the Land Tribunal in LRF.3/1974-75 (Annexure-B). 3. Learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4 submitted that the impugned order in the present writ petition, produced at Annexure-A in Appeal No.718 of 2011 dated 04.04.2016 on the file of Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore has been confirmed by this court in W.P.No.36283 of 2017 dated 11.09.2019 and same was confirmed by the Division Bench of this court in WA.No.274 of 2020 dated 14.09.2021. The said - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20159 WP No. 10068 of 2023 submission is not countered by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed accordingly. In view of dismissal of the main petition, memo filed by the respondents reporting the death of respondent No.5, does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6