1 2025:CGHC:48665 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 29 of 2011 1 - Sureshchandra Sen (Died) Through Lrs- As Per Honble Court Order Dated 26-02-2021 1.1 - Smt. Chaina Sen, W/o Late Shri Suresh Chandra Sen, Aged About 55 Years R/o Pakhanjur, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh. 1.2 - Rupesh Chandra Sen, S/o Late Shri Suresh Chandra Sen, Aged About 27 Years R/o Pakhanjur, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh., 1.3 - Rajgopal Sen, S/o Late Shri Suresh Chandra Sen, Aged About 29 Years R/o Pakhanjur, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh. 1.4 - Shankar Sen, S/o Late Shri Suresh Chandra Sen, Aged About 32 Years R/o Pakhanjur, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Ashok Saha S/o Late Amulya Saha, Aged About 58 Years By Cast- Kayastha, R/o Village- P.V.7, Chote Kapsi, P.S. And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District North Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh), 2 - Paritosh Saha S/o Late Amulya Saha, Aged About 53 Years By Cast- Kayastha, R/o Village- P.V.7, Chote Kapsi, P.S. And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District North Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh), 3 - Smt. Madhavi W/o Late Deepak Saha, Aged About 41 Years By Cast- Kayastha, R/o Village- P.V.7, Chote Kapsi, P.S. And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District North Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh), 4 - Sandeep S/o Late Deepak Saha, Aged About 21 Years R/o SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI 2 Village- P.V.7, Chote Kapsi, P.S. And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District North Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh), 5 - Deepesh S/o Late Deepak Saha, Aged About 17 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Madhavi Saha, By Cast- Kayastha, R/o Village- P.V.7, Chote Kapsi, P.S. And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District North Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh), 6 - Tahsildar, Pakhanjur, P.S. And Tahsil Pakhanjur, District North Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh), 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, North Bastar (CG) ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 22/9/2025 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing in second round, none appears on behalf of appellant. Even in the first round, there was no representation on behalf of appellants. 2. On 4.8.2025 also the matter was taken up for hearing twice, but none appeared on behalf of the appellants. 3. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this second appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-