Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2325 (AP)

GODAVARTHI KARTHIK v. STATE OF AP

WP/75/2021 · 2025-08-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010001072021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.Nos.75 of 2021 & 4576 of 2020 WRIT PETITION NO: 75/2021 Between: 1. GODAVARTHI KARTHIK, S/O. G. SATYANARAYANA AGE. 29, R/O.25-29-59, Q.NO. AE-28C, V.T.P.S. COLONY, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, , NEW DELHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT PASS PORT OFFICE VISAKHAPATNAM 6. REGIONAL PASS PORT OFFICER, PASS PORT OFFICE VIJAYAWADA 7. REGIONAL PASS PORT OFFICER, PASS PORT OFFICE 2 VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO: 4576/2020 Between: 1. GODAVARTHI KARTHIK,, S/O. G. SATYANARAYANA, 29 YEARS, RJO.25-29-59, Q.NO. AE-28C, V.T.P.S. COLONY, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, , NEW DELHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, , WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. YELAMANCHALI NAGESWARA RAO, , EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF VIJAYA BANK, 41/2, TRINITY CIRCLE, M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri T.V.S.Prabhakar Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 59 W.P.Nos.75 of 2021 & 4576 of 2020 Dated.13.08.2025 MH