SH. DEEPANSHU AGARWAL S/O MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
CW/9521/2021 · 2025-03-27
Avneesh Jhingan, Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14188-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9521/2021 Sh. Deepanshu Agarwal S/o Mahendra Kumar Gupta, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of L-17/568, Ashiana Aangan, Alwar By Pass Road, Bhiwadi Alwar, Rajasthan- 301019 Sole Properitor Of M/s Atcg India, Iind Floor, A-206, Spectrum Tower, Bdi Sunshine City, Bhiwadi, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Additional Commissioner, (Appeals) Office Of The Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise And Cgst, Jaipur, Ncrb Statue Circle, Jaipur - 302005
2. Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax Division-C, Bhiwadi, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prateek Kedawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 27/03/2025
1. The writ petition is filed seeking quashing of impugned orders dated 12.11.2020/13.11.2020 & 16.04.2020.
2. One of the grievance raised is that the petitioner has been left remediless as the Goods and Service Tax Tribunal (for short ‘the tribunal’) is not functional till date inspite of implementation of the GST in 2017.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court while disposing of D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1113/2024 with the following directions:-
[2025:RJ-JP:14188-DB] (2 of 3) [CW-9521/2021]
“Though the matter comes up for admission today, with the consent of the parties, the petition is being
disposed of finally. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that at present the Tribunal has not been constituted and the process towards constitution of the Tribunal is going on, therefore, in these circumstances, the petition may not be kept pending but with appropriate protection available under Section 112(8) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (for short ‘the Act’), this petition may be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal within stipulated period from the date the Tribunal is constituted. In support of his submission, he places reliance upon a circular dated 23.03.2020 issued by Government of Rajasthan Finance Department (Tax Division).
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the disposal of the petition on the aforesaid condition.
4. Accordingly, this petition, at this stage, is disposed off with a direction that in case petitioner makes payment as per provisions contained in Sub-section (8) of Section 112 of the Act, further proceedings shall not be drawn for recovery of the balance amount, provided that the petitioner avails statutory remedy of appeal within a period of three months from the date of the constitution of the Tribunal.”
[2025:RJ-JP:14188-DB] (3 of 3) [CW-9521/2021]
4. The petition is disposed of in the same terms. The petitioner shall comply with the requisite of pre-deposit for filing appeal within six weeks from today.
5. Considering that as on date the tribunal is not functional, in the eventuality of the petitioner filing an appeal within three months from the date of constitution of the tribunal, the same shall be considered to have been filed within limitation. Thereafter, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make a request for early disposal of the appeal and the same shall be considered in accordance with law.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Deepa/40