TRIMBAK VITHAL DAPKEKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CA/8995/2023 · 2025-02-12
Shri S G Mehare, Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23249 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23249 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 907.WP-1100-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1100 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8995 OF 2023 IN WP/1100/2022 TRIMBAK VITHAL DAPKEKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kurundkar Sunil V. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. D.R. Korade ...
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 12th FEBRUARY 2025 PER COURT :
1. The office objection is removed because the application to bring the legal heirs on record has been filed and proposed legal heirs of respondent of deceased Respondent No.4 has been served. Nobody appeared for them.
2. We presume that they are the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.4.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed.
4. The proposed legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.4 to be
2 907.WP-1100-2022.doc
brought on record. Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks and thereafter fresh notice be issued to them returnable after six weeks.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ S. G. MEHARE, J.] NAJEEB..