NARASIMHALU @ NARASIMA v. THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CRL OP/5580/2025 · 2025-03-03
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23247 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23247 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.5580 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.03.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.5580 of 2025 Narasihmalu (A) Narasima ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, N-1, Royapuram Police Station, Chennai. 2.Rajeshwari.G. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and quash the FIR registered in Crime No.307 of 2024 against the petitioner pending on the file of the first respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Prasanna Kumar For Respondents For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.307 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.5580 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 295(b), 354 & 509 of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2022 and Sections 67 & 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3. A Joint Compromise Memo has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner and the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.5580 of 2025 641 in the case of Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the FIR in Crime No.307 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent. 5. In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No.307 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed.
The terms of Joint Compromise Memo shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees five thousand only) as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 03.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.5580 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. rts To 1.The Inspector of Police, N-1, Royapuram Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Crl.O.P.No.5580 of 2025 03.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis