APHC010211452019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15585/2019 Between: 1. MOTURI SANJAY PRADEEP,, S/O VENKATA RAMANA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC POLICE CONSTABLE PC-2446, NUNNA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. AND ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.15585 OF 2019 O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned removal order vide Proceedings in C.No.11/PR/2017, dated 13.09.2019 including the Impugned Suspension Order in D.O.No.747/18 (C.No.10/PR/18) dated 28.08.2018 issued by the 1st respondent are illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and besides being opposed to Rules 20 to 24 of the C.C.A.Rules, and set-aside Consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to be reinstated into service with continuity of service with all consequential benefits…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri K.Mallikarjuna Moorthy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the learned counsel for the writ petitioner on record issued No Objection Certificate one year ago, and the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. But, the petitioner did not choose to prosecute the writ petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 20.08.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 85 WRIT PETITION No:15585 OF 2019 Date: 20.08.2025 W PSK