Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23240 (RAJ)

KAMIL S/O SATTAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8618/2025 · 2025-08-06

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30155] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 8618/2025 1. Kamil S/o Sattar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bamni, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (The Accused Petitioner is at present confined in Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Ajruddin @ Ajhar Khan S/o Ratti Kha, aged about 25 years, R/o Pai, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (The Accused Petitioner is at present confined in Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/08/2025 1. S.B. Criminal IInd Bail Application No. 8618/2025 has been filed by the petitioner in respect of FIR No. 90/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2) 313 & 61(2)(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S), 2023 and Section 66-D of I.T. Act, 2008. 2. From the perusal of the record, it has come out that the petitioners Kamil and Arjuddin, earlier filed S.B. Criminal Bail Application No. 5672/2025 alongwith four other co-accused persons. The aforesaid bail application No. 5672/2025 was allowed only to the extent of co-petitioners Mustufa, Juned, Afridi and Maksuddeen. However, the bail application qua the present petitioners Kamil and Ajruddin was withdrawn at that stage. [2025:RJ-JP:30155] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8618/2025] 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that after the aforesaid order dated 11.06.2025, the Investigating Officer has concluded the investigation and has filed charge-sheet on 21.06.2025. After filing of the charge-sheet, custodial investigation is no longer required, whereas the trial is likely to take considerably long time. The alleged offences are otherwise triable by Magistrate. He submits that the other co- accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 5. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 6. In view of above, without making any comments over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant the bail. 7. Accordingly, the Second Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Kamil S/o Sattar & Ajruddin @ Ajhar Khan S/o Ratti Kha shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No.90/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera District Deeg on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused- petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv). They shall regularly mark attendance before SHO of concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. The SHO concerned is directed to maintain record of their monthly attendance. [2025:RJ-JP:30155] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8618/2025] (v). Repetition of similar offence or violation of any of the above conditions would entail automatic cancellation of the instant bail. 8. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/31